A Slip of the They?



Most wouldn't think of the word "they" as a pejorative.

Yet the 911 audio report of the Tiger Woods holiday fender bender certainly spins the situation from bad to worse. Around 00:25, "...they're laying on the ground....", is cited by the concerned neighbor.



A startled from sound sleep interchange of pronoun use? They, he....but note, not a she in the verbiage.

Woods released a statement Sunday, asking to keep the matter private. (Read more here).

FHP must be on board with his request because Tiger has managed to stave off the Florida Highway Patrol by simply refusing to entertain their questions.

Well, you know what "they" say....

Life inside the gates of Windermere is far different than for the rest of us mere mortals.

Wool Over My Eyes



After getting slammed while sitting in Black Friday traffic a few years back, I've learned to stick to thrift shops on the traditional first day of holiday shopping. Yet somewhere between Goodwill and Salvation Army, I got the urge to work in a visit to GAP, my rationale being the replacement of the black tank my daughter "borrowed" during her recent visit.

As I sit here just before 1:00 AM Saturday morning, I think I just needed a Christmas jump start.

Or just a jump start period.

Heavy is the best way to describe this past year. Literally, my head and ears have felt weighed down for months, my sinuses making themselves known to me after a lifetime of sweet solitude beneath my facial structure. I've experienced several changes at home and at work, nothing to write home about, but enough to consider if my stuffy head is some sort of psychosomatic attempt to block out any further infusion of intrusion into my every day.

I figured a jaunt through the throng of a busy crowd would get me in the holiday mood. With my ears cracking and popping, I purchased the black tank and cut an exit through Kid GAP, where a boy about nine repeatedly tossed a wool cap up into the air, oblivious to his mother's clucking.

My life's been a lot like that cap lately, spiraling down only to spiral back up. Something happens, then something else, then yet something else again and more often than not, the something is that someone else's cap has somehow clapped itself down on my stuffy head.

The mother finally jerks the cap out of her son's hands, tosses it back on the display and jerks the kid past me and out of the store. My ears pop as he laughs at his mom and I feel a little dizzy at how easily he repels her frustration.

I turn away from the laughing boy and head through a surprisingly thin crowd towards Starbucks, where coffee at this time of the year often tastes of peppermint.

A Thanksgiving Buzzkill



Happy Thanksgiving.

Bubble-Wrapping Our Kids



A youthful family member recently explained the whole concept of Wii.

With a vision of long ago street kickball games replaying against the back of my eyelids, I asked why the kid just didn't round up a couple of friends, go outside and play?

Pretty much a blank stare, followed by pumped up energy on how much fun Wii was, how everyone had a Wii and I could even play online with other people, you know, if I really wanted to.

Nintendo is one smart bird, figuring out a way to climate-control play, fight back against child obesity linked to inactive children while simutaneously relieving parents of any guilt associated with keeping their kids within tracking range.

Wii has tapped into overparenting.

Although helicopter parenting has been around for years, TIME explores The Growing Backlash Against Overparenting (Nancy Gibbs, 11/20/2009).

The insanity crept up on us slowly; we just wanted what was best for our kids.

We bought macrobiotic cupcakes and hypoallergenic socks, hired tutors to correct a 5-year-old's "pencil-holding deficiency," hooked up broadband connections in the treehouse but took down the swing set after the second skinned knee. We hovered over every school, playground and practice field — "helicopter parents," teachers christened us, a phenomenon that spread to parents of all ages, races and regions. Stores began marketing stove-knob covers and "Kinderkords" (also known as leashes; they allow "three full feet of freedom for both you and your child") and Baby Kneepads (as if babies don't come prepadded). The mayor of a Connecticut town agreed to chop down three hickory trees on one block after a woman worried that a stray nut might drop into her new swimming pool, where her nut-allergic grandson occasionally swam. A Texas school required parents wanting to help with the second-grade holiday party to have a background check first. Schools auctioned off the right to cut the carpool line and drop a child directly in front of the building — a spot that in other settings is known as handicapped parking.
.

And afterwards, go paint four bases out on the street. I'd recommend fluorescent orange. The street lights super-illuminate the diamond for kids involved in sudden death kickball, who just can't let the game go because the sun chose to set at the most inopportune moment.

Organizing Genius


An engineer meets a frog who offers the engineer anything he wants if he will kiss the frog.

"No," says the engineer.

"Come on," says the frog. "Kiss me, and I'll turn into a beautiful woman."

"Nah," says the engineer. "I don't have time for a girlfriend ...but a talking frog, that's really neat."

--Warren Bennis and Patricia Ward Biederman, Organizing Genius

Read more about organizing Great Groups here.

Pulp Diction


Jon Stewart "goes Tarantino" on Nancy Grace

Check it out, beginning on or about 07:00.

Enjoy.

Child Safety Zones Work



Take a few moments today to read Dr. Jill Levenson's 11/14/2009 op-ed over at the Miami Herald here.

(Many thanks to Eye on Miami (11/15/2009) for posting the following comments by a self-described child advocate who has yet to conduct one research-based study proving his claims).

(...)

"Book repeatedly waves his hand in dismissal of any empirical research suggesting that residential restrictions don't work. He misrepresents the research and their authors." And:

"Ron Book is an admirable and tireless advocate for children. But it is time to stop holding onto illusions about what we hope to be true. Continuing to steer resources toward policies that don't work promotes a false sense of security and is fiscally irresponsible. Book should work with other experts and use facts and research to advocate for sexual-abuse prevention policies that will achieve their goals. Don't children deserve that?"

Dr. Levenson, associate professor and sex crimes researcher at Lynn University and chairperson of Broward County's Sexual Offender Residence Task Force, also indicated:

(...)

Book goes on to say that the studies ``conflict with data from Miami-Dade County showing absconding and crimes against children have gone down while compliance with sex-offender registration requirements has gone up.'' According to the Crimes Against Children Research Center at the University of New Hampshire, child sexual-abuse rates nationwide have dropped 49 percent over the past 15 years.

That is good news, but it can't be attributed to residence restrictions. Sex-offender absconding has decreased in Florida, and that too is good news, but is a comparison of apples and oranges. Book has never cited a published study demonstrating the effectiveness of residence restrictions because none exists.

Ron Book is an admirable and tireless advocate for children. But it is time to stop holding onto illusions about what we hope to be true. Continuing to steer resources toward policies that don't work promotes a false sense of security and is fiscally irresponsible. Book should work with other experts and use facts and research to advocate for sexual-abuse prevention policies that will achieve their goals. Don't children deserve that?

(...)

Florida's Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability concluded that residential-restriction laws for sex offenders are ineffective in preventing repeat abuse.

They suggested instead that child-safety zones, which prohibit registered sex offenders from loitering in places where children congregate, would be more successful in achieving the goal of keeping known sex offenders away from children. The legislative policy analyst who testified based the conclusions on published research demonstrating that residence restrictions do not prevent abuse and that an offender's proximity to schools and daycares is not linked to recidivism.



Read and Learn.


Does Residential Proximity Matter? A Geographic Analysis of Sex Offense Recidivism (Criminal Justice and Behavior, Vol. 35, No. 4, 484-504 (2008).

Breaker! Breaker! Education Discrimination?



Question to ponder this weekend.

Can a private vo-tech--conducting CDL training here in Florida--discriminate against acceptance of an ex-felon for training solely on the basis that the school cannot guarantee job placement upon course completion?

Obama's Low-End Option



Will we stay or will we go?

The NYT (11/11/09):

(...)

General Eikenberry sent his reservations to Washington in a cable last week, the officials said. In that same period, President Obama and his national security advisers have begun examining an option that would send relatively few troops to Afghanistan, about 10,000 to 15,000, with most designated as trainers for the Afghan security forces.

This low-end option was one of four alternatives under consideration by Mr. Obama and his war council at a meeting in the White House Situation Room on Wednesday afternoon. The other three options call for troop levels of around 20,000, 30,000 and 40,000, the three officials said.

Mr. Obama asked General Eikenberry about his concerns during the meeting on Wednesday, officials said, and raised questions about each of the four military options and how they might be tinkered with or changed. A central focus of Mr. Obama’s questions, officials said, was how long it would take to see results and be able to withdraw.

“He wants to know where the off-ramps are,” one official said.

Mr. Obama is expected to mull over his options during a trip to Asia that begins Thursday. He is due back in Washington on Nov. 19 and could announce the policy before Thanksgiving, officials said, but is more likely to wait until early December.

(...)


The officials cited in this report spoke under anonymity.

We wait.

Howard Cosell Here...And That Man Can Sing

Throwing a dedication out to all America's vets.

Marvin Gaye. 1979



Thank you for your service to our country.

The Rothstein Hot Seat



When it comes to ill-gotten gains, no one scatters faster than the recipients (or the perceived recipient of).


The Palm Beach Post (11/8/09):

(...)

Revelations that Fort Lauderdale lawyer Scott Rothstein's nearly $1.4 million in political contributions since 2006 - much of it landing in Tallahassee - might be tainted also chilled the marbled halls of the Capitol and its environs.

(...)

The allegations that Rothstein had bilked investors and the law firm he founded out of as much as $500 million unfolded during a committee week in Tallahassee, just as the indictment against another political rainmaker, Broward County eye doctor Alan Mendelsohn, had a little more than a month before.

Both were generous fund-raisers not just for Gov. Charlie Crist but for politicians of all stripes, as they coughed up cash for campaigns and charities.

Lobbyists, lawmakers and staffers were glued to their BlackBerrys monitoring blog posts as the Rothstein drama unfolded from Monday throughout the week. Developments in the saga dominated chatter in the hangouts surrounding the 22-story Capitol. By late Wednesday, the clientele at the popular watering hole Clyde's and Costello's was whispering about an FBI raid on the offices of Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler even as it was going down hundreds of miles away in Fort Lauderdale.

For some, it held the same morbid appeal of watching a train wreck. For others, it posed a more ominous threat.

Flynn observed that some were thinking this "could be happening to me. You never know where these things go."


You never know where these things go.


And with the feds on the money trail, all bets are off. Additionally, with so many ties to South Florida, I'm very interested in what the Palm Beach Post describes as entities.

Those on the hot seat of explaining to do....

(...)

South Florida Republicans whose campaigns received money from Rothstein or entities associated with him include Senate President Jeff Atwater of North Palm Beach, Sen. Joe Negron of Stuart, House Majority Leader Adam Hasner of Boca Raton, and Reps. Ellyn Bogdanoff of Fort Lauderdale, Juan Zapata of Miami and Carlos Lopez-Cantera of Miami, according to state records. (U.S. Rep. Adam Putnam, R-Lakeland was mentioned previously in the above cited article).

Rothstein also gave to Democrats, including Sens. Ted Deutch of Boca Raton, Dan Gelber of Miami Beach, Jeremy Ring of Margate and Chris Smith of Fort Lauderdale, along with House Democratic Leader Franklin Sands of Weston and Reps. Martin Kiar of Davie and Evan Jenne of Dania Beach. Jenne's father, disgraced Broward Sheriff Ken Jenne, took a job with the lobbying arm of Rothstein's law firm after he was released from prison last year.

Research more contributions here.

Bob Norman of The Daily Pulp posted his September brush with Mr. Rothstein a couple months back. A brief skim of the interlude fairly sums up why Florida's been caught up in a strangle hold all these years. Read Scott Rothstein Calls Himself "Jewish Avenger," Out to Destroy the Pulp here.

Filling the Void




The void over at the Florida House Public Safety & Domestic Security Committee is beginning to fill with education.

The Miami Herald
(11/4/09):

(...)

Marti Harkness, a criminal-justice analyst, told the House Public Safety & Domestic Security Committee that studies from Florida, Minnesota and Colorado showed almost no link between a sex offender's residency and the crime he committed.

But onerous residency restrictions increase the chances that offenders will be homeless, hard to track and more likely to commit new crimes, said Harkness, who works for the Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability.

``I'm not suggesting we should feel sorry for them,'' Harkness said. ``But I guess what I am saying is that research shows that to prevent a sex offender from living with their families or [to make them live] farther away from work or treatment because of residency restrictions, you may actually in fact diminish public safety.''

Harkness and the committee members said that more electronic monitoring of sex offenders was a better way to control them.

Under state law, sex offenders can't live within 1,000 feet of schools, day-care centers, parks or other areas where kids congregate. But 148 local governments across the state have imposed stricter requirements -- a 2,500-foot ban.

That has led to a crisis in places like Miami-Dade, where sex offenders live under the Julia Tuttle Bridge between Miami and Miami Beach to comply with the law. Showing a map of Miami-Dade, Harkness pointed out that sex offenders have almost nowhere else to live under a 2,500-foot ban -- except for Miami International Airport.

``You could have them lining the tarmac, I guess,'' Harkness said.

Miami Beach Rep. Luis Garcia, a Democrat and former councilman from Miami Beach who supported his city's ban, took issue with the Harkness report.

``As far as I'm concerned, if you want to send them to Georgia, I would be happy,'' Garcia said.

Rep. Darryl Rouson, D-St. Petersburg, said lawmakers should apologize for comments like Garcia's and ``knee-jerk'' policies like the residency restrictions.

Said Garcia: ``I'm not going to apologize.''

(...)


BTW. For a state experiencing such huge budgetary deficits, I'd say the purchase of electronic monitoring devices for all forced to register has about as much chance of making the Florida must have list as a fleet of snow plows.

300 Feet



What does a 300 foot buffer zone look like to you?

For St. Johns County, Florida, a child safety zone looks a little something like this:

"...County Commission adopted a Child Safety Zone ordinance prohibiting registered sexual offenders and predators from loitering or prowling within 300 feet of specified locations designed for or used by children."(jacksonville.com, 9/5/2009)

Such areas have been traditionally designated as schools, bus stops (when kids are present), parks, arcades, but believe me, the list can mean whatever an officer of the law could make it out to mean. I would say viewing the upcoming Jim Carrey "A Christmas Carol" could be considered a place where children are known to gather.

Leading me to my point.

I perceive loitering as bandying about an area with no specific purpose. In my opinion, utilizing a boat launch located in a public park or dropping your kid off at school is not loitering. Neither is attending a family reunion in a state park or utilizing a public library, all public facilities persons designated as RSO's support via payment of their tax dollars. (Well, those who are still working....)

Would 300 foot buffer zones permit the legal comings and goings of the above described facilities? Or could loitering become as ill-defined as the catch all phrase "where children gather"?