Florida Sheriffs Misinform Public about Prison Reforms



Found an editorial over at the Daytona Beach News Journal Online (Overtime served, Reforming Florida's violent incarceration mentality, 12/29/2009) that calls out a couple of Florida sheriffs regarding the passing of misinformation to the public that both tout as gospel regarding the possible legislative reforms of the state's prison system.

Gospel that proved fairly effective when the plate was passed during far different state budgetary times.

(...)

Like other law enforcement officials in the state, Volusia County Sheriff Ben Johnson is sowing undue fear and misinformation about legislative proposals that would reform the state's overly harsh and unsustainably costly prison system. Johnson is following the lead of Brevard County Sheriff Jack Parker, who claims -- wrongly -- that "Florida is funding prisons less and less" while preparing to release offenders early.

(...)

Writing on the Sheriff's Office's Web site, Johnson wants residents to oppose "a particularly bad proposal that would grant early release to certain inmates 50-years-old or older as long as they have already served at least 25 years of their sentence." He is also building opposition to another proposal that "would reduce the sentence of dangerous youthful offenders under certain circumstances" -- offenders 15 or younger who were convicted as adults.

Johnson makes it sound as if violent offenders are never released (or should never be released) from prison. He should have a look at Department of Corrections reports. Better yet, he should encourage his readers to do so. Last August alone, 3,073 offenders were released from Florida prisons. Of those, 814, or 26.5 percent, were violent offenders. On average, those violent offenders served 53 months. Johnson says, "This is not the type of person we want roaming our streets again." But every prison system in the nation eventually releases a portion of its violent offenders for the obvious reason that life terms are rare. Johnson also makes it sound as if the proposals, if enacted, would result in immediate releases. Not so. Prisoners would have to petition for their release and have their cases reviewed one by one. It's a restoration of parole by other means.

Criminals aren't getting more violent or committing more crimes. The state's incarceration laws have been made harsher since the mid-1980s (when Florida abolished parole) and the 1990s (when Florida harshed up mandatory sentences on adults and youthful offenders and ended the release of any state prison inmate before he or she serves at least 85 percent of a sentence). Yet, criminologists cast serious doubt on the effectiveness of harsher sentences, which contradict the principle of rehabilitation. It's called a department of corrections, not a department of punishment.

(...)

Since 2001, when it was at $1.62 billion, the Department of Corrections' budget has increased by 50 percent. It's at $2.43 billion today, a 5.7 percent increase over last year's $2.3 billion. The department's budget devours almost 10 percent of the state's general revenue to maintain a total payroll of 30,500 that keeps 100,000 inmates in prison -- a 3-to-1 per-inmate ratio. That's about eight times better than the state's teacher-pupil ratio. Despite a crime rate that has fallen steadily through the decade, the inmate population has risen 46 percent since 2001.


More Fun Facts:

(...)

Figures released by the Justice Department reflect 1.6 million persons remain incarcerated in this country's prisons, although "...the rate of growth is slowing as state authorities look for cheaper ways to mete out justice." (Throw in those sitting behind bars in jail and the number rises to a cool 2.3 million).

That's one out of every 133 U.S. residents in jail or prison over the last year.

The states with the largest increases in prison population were Pennsylvania, Florida and Arizona, whose one-year increases were all greater than the federal prison system, which grew by 1,662 inmates. (Miami Herald, 12/8/09)



“They simply cost too much. It’s not ideological, it’s pragmatic. This is the first time that we have alliances on the right and left on this issue, and it’s the money that has forced the issue.”

Professor Ram Cnaan, School of Social Policy and Practice, University of Pennsylvania